Skip to content 
In public policy and investment decision-making, determining whether a project is worth pursuing hinges on more than just projected costs and benefits. Time, risk, and uncertainty play significant roles in shaping those projections—making the discount rate a central tool in cost-benefit analysis (CBA). But what exactly is the discount rate, and how does it connect to the broader challenges of assessing public projects?
Understanding the Discount Rate
The discount rate reflects the value of time in economic decision-making. Since resources used today are not equivalent to the same resources used in the future, future costs and benefits must be adjusted—or discounted—to reflect their present value. This process is fundamental in CBA, allowing policymakers to evaluate long-term investments such as infrastructure, health programs, or education reforms.
In the public sector, we rely on a social discount rate, which differs from private sector rates. While a private investor focuses on maximizing personal returns, governments must consider social opportunity costs, equity, and intergenerational fairness. The choice of the right discount rate can significantly influence whether a project appears viable.
Choosing an Appropriate Discount Rate
The debate on the right discount rate is ongoing. Several options are considered in policy and academic circles:
- Market Interest Rate: This reflects the cost of capital in financial markets. While observable and accessible, market rates are often volatile, influenced by economic cycles, and can be distorted by market imperfections or monopolies. Therefore, they may not fully capture the social implications of public investments.
- Government Borrowing Rate: Since governments are large borrowers, their borrowing rate is often proposed as a risk-free benchmark. However, this assumption is flawed, as public projects may still carry risks, and the borrowing rate may not represent the true economic cost of capital.
- Social Opportunity Cost Rate: This approach considers what society gives up in terms of private investment opportunities when resources are allocated to public projects. It’s based on either the return on private sector projects or the inverse of the capital-output ratio. While theoretically sound, its practical application can be complex.
- Social Time Preference Rate (STPR): This consumption-based approach argues that investment should be evaluated against the value of displaced present consumption. The STPR incorporates diminishing marginal utility, time preference, and risk—factors that better reflect societal values over time.
Handling Risk and Uncertainty
All public investments face uncertainty—future outcomes may not align with projections due to economic shocks, political changes, or implementation challenges. Therefore, incorporating risk management strategies into CBA is essential:
- Gather More Information: Better data reduces uncertainty and helps avoid poor decisions.
- Be Conservative: Use cautious estimates to avoid overly optimistic projections.
- Adjust the Discount Rate: Riskier projects may justify a higher discount rate.
- Sensitivity Analysis: Test how results change with variations in key assumptions—this highlights where the biggest risks lie.
Conclusion
The discount rate is more than just a number—it is a reflection of how society values time, risk, and trade-offs. In cost-benefit analysis, choosing the right rate and addressing uncertainty with care ensures that public investments are not only economically sound but socially responsible. As governments aim to achieve long-term development goals, mastering these tools is essential for effective and accountable policymaking.
